The Effect Of The Use Intelligent Adaptive Learning Techniques To Build A Program Capable Of Developing The Educational Abilities Of The Future Teacher In History
Keywords:
Educational techniquesAbstract
The current research aims at finding out the effect of using intelligent adaptive learning programs on the history teacher. The researcher found that most models of educational design are in the field of enhancing and building the teacher's cognitive and measuring its effect on the learner.
The behavioral psychology, which has become interested in constructional theories of education based on the five-point model, (Bates & Watson, 2008:38-44). Therefore, the researcher relied on this model to enhance the design with data and information concerning the scope of learning, the field of application, objectives and tasks with the conditions surrounding the educational process and the readiness of the teacher to receive such a kind of modern teaching methods in order to build an educational experience that makes the process of knowledge acquisition effective and attractive. And to ascertain the validity and readiness of the application of this type of modern educational programs and use as educational framework. The researcher adopted a scientific mechanism based on building a program to detect patterns of interaction between the inputs and outputs of the intelligent educational system and the use of feedback to correct the course of this program as shown in Figure (2). In this research, three hypotheses were adopted:
- The primary purpose of Intelligent Adaptive Learning is to reduce the social comparison of a particular student with his / her peers in the learning environment. Where the student looks at his own positives only and compares himself with the possibility of development and achieving individual goals. Especially in the subject of history as it contains a variety of diverse topics.
- The student can maintain his confidence in his knowledge and develop it to create a positive educational identity of his own.
- The student may be considered a subject or a target. If the student is enabled in the proposed program to be able to implement his or her own education plan in consultation with a mentor, or to be able to choose between alternatives within a single subject, this is often called qualitative adaptation, where the student is the source of learning activity. While the teacher has been adopted as the main source of all decisions he is solely responsible for modifying levels, contents, strategies, etc. This is often called quantitative adjustment. Which was confirmed by the researcher because it carries the dimensions of legislative and scientific:
1)The legislative dimension, where the teacher proposes reverse options, often called why?
2) Practical dimension, no attempt to understand for (how and what to do) in the specified lesson.
References
المصادر :
- Bates, C. & Eatson, M. (2008). Re-Leaching techniques to be effective in hybrid and online courses. Journal of American Academy of Business, 13 (1), 38-44.
- Bjekic, D; Krneta, R; & Milosevic, D. (2010). Teacher education from e-learner to e-teacher: master curriculum. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 9(1), 202-212.
- Posner, George J., and Alan N. Rudnitsky. Course design: A guide to curriculum development for teachers. Longman, 10 Bank Street, White Plains, NY 10606-1951, 1994.
- Gagne, Robert M., and Leslie J. Briggs. Principles of instructional design. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1974.
- Peter Brusilovsky, and Christoph Peylo, 'Adaptive and Intelligent Web-Based Educational Systems', International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED), 13 (2003), 159-72
- Peter Brusilovsky, 'Methods and Techniques of Adaptive Hypermedia', User modeling and user-adapted interaction, 6 (1996), 87-129.
- Trevor JM Bench-Capon, and Paul E Dunne, 'Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence', Artificial intelligence, 171 (2007), 619-41.
- Alexandros Paramythis, and Susanne Loidl-Reisinger, 'Adaptive Learning Environments and E-Learning Standards', in Second european conference on e-learning, 2003), pp. 369-79
- Ryszard S Michalski, Jaime G Carbonell, and Tom M Mitchell, Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence ApproachSpringer Science & Business Media, 2013).
- Robert Walter Lawler, and Masoud Yazdani, Artificial Intelligence and Education: Learning Environments and Tutoring Systems. Vol. 1Intellect Books, 1987).
- Chien Chou, 'Interactivity and Interactive Functions in Web‐Based Learning Systems: A Technical Framework for Designers', British Journal of Educational Technology, 34 (2003), 265-79.
- Carol Carrier, Gayle Davidson, and Michael Williams, 'The Selection of Instructional Options in a Computer-Based Coordinate Concept Lesson', Educational Technology Research and Development, 33 (1985), 199-212.
- Steven M Ross, Gary R Morrison, and Jacqueline K O'Dell, 'Uses and Effects of Learner Control of Context and Instructional Support in Computer-Based Instruction', Educational Technology Research and Development, 37 (1989), 29-39.
- John Seely, Oxford Az of Grammar and Punctuation Oxford University Press, (2013).
- Frank Hanisch, and Wolfgang Straßer, 'Highly Interactive Web-Based Courseware', University of Tübingen, Germany, (2004).
- Scott G Paris, and Peter Winograd, 'The Role of Self-Regulated Learning in Contextual Teaching: Principals and Practices for Teacher Preparation', (2003).
- Linda Darling-Hammond, and John Bransford, Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and Be Able to DoJohn Wiley & Sons, 2007).
- Mark G Gillingham, and Andrew Topper, 'Technology in Teacher Preparation: Preparing Teachers for the Future', Journal of Technology and teacher Education, 7 (1999), 303-21.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.