Communicative Satisfaction among high school teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23813/FA/28/3/4Abstract
The current research aims to identify:
- The level of communication satisfaction among high school teachers.
- Identify the significance of the differences in communication satisfaction according to the gender variable.
- Identify the significance of the differences in communication satisfaction according to the specialization variable.
The research sample consisted of (400) male and female teachers from district center schools (Baquba, Al-Muqdadiya, Baladruz) Of both sexes. The research sample was chosen by a simple random method with a proportional distribution. To achieve the research objectives, the researcher adapted the (communicative satisfaction) scale according to a model (Hecht,1978). The scale consisted of (20) items, and the face validity and construct validity were verified. The reliability was verified using a retest method, and the reliability coefficient reached (81%). While the reliability coefficient of the tool according to the Cronbach method reached (70%) and using the statistical package (SPSS) as a method. Statistically, the following results were reached:
- Secondary school teachers enjoy communicative satisfaction.
- There are no statistically significant differences in the degree of communication satisfaction according to the gender variable.
- There are statistically significant differences in the degree of communication satisfaction according to the specialization variable and in favor of scientific specialization.
In light of the findings, the researcher presents a set of recommendations and proposals.
References
ابو علام، رجاء محمود (2011): مناهج البحث في العلوم النفسية والتربوية، دار النشر للجامعات، القاهرة ،ط7.
الامام، مصطفى محمود والعجيلي، صباح حسين(1990): التقويم والقياس، دار الحكمة، بغداد.
الشربيني وصادق، وزكريا ويسرية، سامي وعلاء، هاشم والنجار(2012): مناهج البحث العلمي الاسس النظرية والتطبيقية والتقنية الحديثة، دار الفكر العربي ، القاهرة،ط1.
عبد المؤمن، علي معمر (2008): مناهج البحث في العلوم الاجتماعية والاساسيات والتقنيات والاساليب، جامعة 7 اكتوبر، ليبيا.
عطيفة، حمدي ابو الفتوح(2012): منهجيات البحث العلمي في التربية وعلم النفس، دار النشر للجامعات،ط1 ، القاهرة.
عيسوي، عبد الرحمن محمد (1985): تصميم البحوث النفسية والاجتماعية والتربوية، بيروت، دار الراتب الجامعية،ط1.
فرج، صفوت (2007): القياس والتقويم، مكتبة الانجلو المصرية للطباعة والنشر، القاهرة، ط 6.
خلف ، احمد حسن (2023): الرضا التواصلي وعلاقته بالشغف المتناغم وانماط العواطف المعرفية لدى طلبة الجامعة، اطروحة دكتوراه غير منشورة .
محاسنة/ ابراهيم محمد (2013): القياس النفسي في ظل النظرية الحديثة، دار جرير للنشر والتوزيع، القاهرة، ط 1.
المصادر الاجنبية :
Baron,R.M.& Kenny, D.A. (1986): The moderator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual,strategic,and,statistical considerations Journal of person- ality and Social psychology,51,1173-1182.
Eble ,R.L (1972): Essentials of Educational Measurement, new Jersey Englewood Cliffs.
Fransella, F.(1981). Personality theory, Measurement and research. London : Methuen an co.
Goodboy, A . K., M. M., & Bolkan, S . (2009) : The development and Validation of the student communication satisfaction scale , Journal of communication Education 58 , 372-396.
Howard, J . R., Henney, A. L.,(1998): Student participation and instructor gender in the mixed- age college classroom, The Journal of Higher Education,69, 384-405.
Harie, O.,& Tourish, D.( Eds).(2000).Handbook of communication audits for organisations . psychology press.
Hecht, M .L. (1978). The conceptualization and measurement of interpersonal communication satisfaction. Human communication research.
Kumar, b.p., & Giri, V. N. (2009 November). Examining the Relationship of Organizational communication and Job satisfaction in Indian Organizations . 4(3), 177 -184.
Mcpherson, B.& Liang, Y .J. (2007): Students reactions to teachers, management of compulsive communicators, Journal of communication Education, 56, 18-33.
Myers, S. A(2004): The relationship between perceived instructor credibility and college student in – class and out- of – class communication, Journal of communication Reports, 17, 129-137.
Myers , S .A .(2001). Perceived instructor credibility and verbal aggressiveness in the college class – room , Journal of communication Research Reports, 18, 354 -364.
Ogaard, T ., Marnburg, E., & Larsen , S. (2008). Perceptions of organizational structure in the hospitality industry : Commitment, job satisfaction and perceived performance. Tourism Management, 29(4), 661-671.
Rudick, C.& Golsan , K. B. (2014): Revisiting the relational communication perspective: Drawing upon relational dialectics theory to map an expanded research agenda for communication, 78, 255- 273.
Redhead, G., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2013) The functions of language: An experimental study . Evolutionary psychology ,11 (4), 845-854.
Wiesenfeld, B.M., Raghuram, S., & Garud, R. (1999). Communication patterns as determinants of organizational identification in a virtual organization. Organization science , 10(6), 777 -790.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
