Pun in Arabic Classical Rhetoric with Reference to Translation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23813/FA/2013/17/2/01Abstract
Conclusion :
This research is an attempt to explore the nature of the subject of puns and the role it plays
Play it in Arabic rhetoric. If we look at it as a rhetorical device, the pun
It makes Arabic texts (Quranic, poetic and other eloquent expressions) more lively and
brighter and make its content richer with expressive semantic values. A topic has been addressed
The rhetorical differences between Arabic and English in looking at puns
This resulted in the exclusion of anaphora outside the circle of Arabic puns, as it is a rhetorical color
Badia with a functional and phonetic character, adopted as a kind of pun in Western rhetoric in a way
general. The pun in Arabic rhetoric is seen as a process that occurs in a level
Lexical, where the word with multiple meanings is used in a way that is not devoid of deception or
Confusion, confusion, or vagueness to create a kind of intentional confusion in these meanings.
Arabic puns of all kinds, especially those used in Quranic texts
Poetic texts represent an obstacle to translation into English, as most of them are of the same nature
An Arab Islamic cultural specificity. Also, in this research, procedures and techniques were suggested
Basic and important for its use in translating Arabic puns into English.
References
References:
Ali, A.Y. (1937). The Meaning of the Glorious Quran. 2
Vols.Cairo: Dār ?al-Kitāb ?al-Misrī Press.
Bassnett-McGuire, S. (1980). Translation Studies. London:
Methuen and Co.Ltd.
Böhmerová, A. (2010). “Lexical Ambiguity as a Linguistic
and Lexicographical Phenomenon in English”. In
Kehoe, J. Ambiguity: Conference Proceedings.
Ružomberok: Verbum. pp:27 – 33.
Brislin, R. (1976). “Introduction”, in Brislin, R.(ed).
Translation, Application and Research. New
York: R. Gardener Press, Inc., pp: 1-45.
Brower, R. (1974). Mirror on Mirror. Cambridge Mass.:
Harvard University Press.
Bucaria,C. (2004). “Lexical and Syntactic Ambiguity as a
Source of Humor: the Case of News Paper
Headlines”. Humor 17(3)pp:279 -309.
Casagrande, J. (1954). “The Ends of Translation”.
International Journal of American Linguistics,
: 335-340.
Catford, J.C. (1965). A Linguistic Theory of Translation.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Corbett, E.P. (1966). Classical Rhetoric for the Modern
Student. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cruse, D.A . ( 2000). Meaning in Language.Oxford:Oxford
University
Press.
Dunbar,G.(2001). “Towards a cognitive analysis of
polysemy,ambiguity and vagueness”.Cognitive
Linguistics.12(1).pp:1 – 14.
Al- Fatih Journal . No. 54 July 2013 Dr. Hamid Hussein AL-hajjaj
Mayyadah Nazar Ali
-45-
Evans, B. and Evans, C. (1957). A Dictionary of
Contemporary American Usage. New York:
Random House.
Hanks, P. (1979). Collins English Dictionary.
London: Collins.
Hartmann, R.R. and Stork, F.C. (1972). Dictionary of
Language and Linguistics. London: Applied
Sciences Publishers.
Hatim, B. and Mason, I. (1990). Discourse and the
Translator. London: Longman.
Jackobson, R. (1992). “On Linguistic Aspects of
Translation”, in Schulte, R. and Biguenet, J.
(eds). Theories of Translation: An Anthology of
Essays from Dryden to Derrida. Chicago:
Chicago University Press, pp: 144-151.
Kachru, Y. (1982). “Towards Defining the Notion
‘Equivalence’ in Contrastive Analysis”. TESL,
: 82-98.
Komissarov, V. (1985). “The Practical Value of Translation
Theory”. Babel, 13 (4):208-220.
Leech, G. (1969). A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry.
London: Longman.
Manser, M.H. and Turton, N. D. (1987). The Penguin
Wordmaster Dictionary. New York: Penguin.
Newmark,P. (1982). Approaches to Translation.Oxford:
Pergamon Press Ltd.
---------------- (1988). A Textbook to Translation. New York:
Prentice Hall.
Nida, E.A.(1964).Towards a Science of
Translation.Leiden:E.J.Brill.
Nida, E.A. and Taber, C.R. (1969). The Theory and Practice
of Translation. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Al- Fatih Journal . No. 54 July 2013 Dr. Hamid Hussein AL-hajjaj
Mayyadah Nazar Ali
-46-
Partington, A. S. (2009). “A Linguistic account of wordplay:
the lexical grammar of punning”. Journal of
pragmatics: 41: 1794 – 1809.
Sageder,D. (2010). “ Ambiguity in Business Language –
Communication Barrier or Effective Tool?”. In
Kehoe,J.Op.Cit.,pp: 56 – 58.
Savory, T. (1968). The Art of Translation. London: Jonthan
Cope Ltd.
Simpson,P.(2003).On the Discourse of Satire:Towards a
Stylistic Model of Satirical Humer.Amsterdam:John
Benjamins Publishing Co.
Tondl, L. (2006). Problémy Semantiky. Praha
(UK):Karolinum.
Tymoczko, M. (1985). “How Distinct are Formal and
Dynamic Equivalence?”, in Hermans, T. (ed). The
Manipulation of Literature: Studies in Literary
Translation. London: Croom Helm Ltd, pp: 63-86.
Tóth , À.(2010). “On Lexical Ambiguity”. In In Kehoe,J.
Op.Cit.,pp: 8 – 17.
Van den Broeck, R. (1978). “The Concept of Equivalent in
Translation”, in Holms, J., Lambert, J., and Van den
Broeck, R. (eds). Literature and Translation.
Belgium: Leuven, Acco, pp: 29-47.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1972). “Foundation for Typologies of
Texts”. Semiotica, 6: 297-323.
Vinay, J. P. and Darbelnet, J. (1958). A Methodology for
Translation. (J. C. Sager & M. J. Hamel, trans). In
L.Venuti (ed), The Translation Studies Reader (pp. 84
– 93). London and New York: Routledge.
Waard, J. and Nida, E. (1986). From One Language to
Another: Functional Equivalence in Bible
Translating. New York: Thomas Nelson, Camden.
Al- Fatih Journal . No. 54 July 2013 Dr. Hamid Hussein AL-hajjaj
Mayyadah Nazar Ali
-47-
Zgusta, L. (1971). Manual of Lexicography. Czechoslovak:
Academia.
Arabic References:
The Glorious Quran
?al - Buturi:, W. 9. (1972). Diwa:n ?al - Buturi:, 5
vols. (edited by) assan Ka:mil ?al -
ayraffi:. Cairo: Da:r ?al – Ma9a:rif.
?al – Ja:rim, A. and ?ami:n, M. (1999). ?al – Bala:ghah
?al – Wa:iah (?ash - Shar). Cairo: Da:r
?al – Ma9a:rif.
?al – Jawhari:, ?. . (1956). ?a - ai:: Ta:j ?al –
Lughah wa ai: ?al – 9arabiyyah. Vol. 6.
Beirut: Da:r ?al – 9ilm Lilmala:i:n.
?al - amawi:, ?. Ḥ. (2004). Khiza:nat ?al - ?adab wa
g̣ha:yat ?al - ?arab. Beirut: Da:r wa Maktabat
?al – Hila:l.
?al - Ḥulli:, Ṣ ?. (1992). Shuru: ?al – Ka:fiyyah ?al –
Badi:9iyyah fi: 9ulu:m ?al – Balaghah wa
Maa:sin ?al – Badi:9. (edited by) Nasi:b
Nashsha:wi:. Beirut: Da:r a:dir.
?ibn ?abi: Rabi:9ah , 9. (1935). Di:wa:n 9umar bin ?abi:
Rabi:9ah. 3 vols. (edited by) Jabra:?i:l Jabbu:r.
Beirut: Da:r ?al – 9ilm Lilmala:i:n.
?az – Zabi:di:, M. M. (1965). Ta:j ?al – 9aru:s. vol. 1.
Kuwait: Maba9at ?al - uku:mah.
?ibn Sana:? ?al-Mulk, H. J. (1958). Diwa:n ?ibn Sana:?
?al – Mulk. ayddar ?a:ba:d ?al – Dikin:
Da:?irat ?al – Ma9a:rif ?al – Hindiyyah.
?a - Ṣa9i:di:, ?. M. (no date). Bug̣hyyat ?al - ?ia:
Litalkhi: ?al – Mifta:ḥ fi: 9ulu:m ?al –
Bala:g̣hah. Vol. 4. Cairo: ?al - Maṭ ba9ah ?an –
Numu:thajjiyyah.
?a - Ṣafadi:, Ṣ. ?. (1979). Fa ?al – Khita:m 9an ?at –
Tawriyyah wal - ?i
Al- Fatih Journal . No. 54 July 2013 Dr. Hamid Hussein AL-hajjaj
Mayyadah Nazar Ali
-48-
Muḥ ammadi: abdul 9azi:z ?al - ina:wi:. Cairo:
?al – Maktabah ?al - ?azhariyyah liltura:th.
aba:nah, B. (1977). Mu9jam ?al-Balaghah ?al9arabiyyah. 2 vols. Libya: Manshu:ra:t Ja:mi9at
ara:blis.
?al – 9a:bid, A.; 9abdu: .D.; 9umar, A.M.; ?aṭ - u9ma, .
J.; ?al- Jayla:ni: ,Ḥ. Y. and Mar9ashli:,N. (1988).
?al – Mu9jam ?al – 9arabi: ?al - ?asa:si:. Paris:
Larousse.
ati:q, 9. 9. (1971). 9ilm ?al – Badi:9. Beirut: Da:r ?an -
Nahah ?al – 9arabiyyah liliba:9ah wan –
Nashr.
?al-Qazwi:ni:, J. M. (1904). ?at-Talkhi:s fi: 9ulu:m ?alBala:ghah. (edited by) 9abd ?ar-Raḥma:n ?alBarqu:qi:. Beirut: da:r ?al-kita:b ?al-9arabi:.
ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ) .1998). ?al - ?i:ḍ a:ḥ fi: 9ulu:m ?al
– Bala:g̣hah. Beirut: Da:r ?ihya:? ?al-9ulu:m.
?ibn Mandhu:r, J. M. M. (no date). Lisa:n ?al – 9arab.
Vol. 6. Cairo: Da:r ?al – Ma9a:rif.
?al - Miri:, ?. (1963). Tari:r ?at - Tabi:r fi:
ina:9at ?ash – Shi9r wan – Nathr wa Baya:n
?i9ja:z ?al – Qur?a:n. (edited by) afni:
Muammad Sharaf. Cairo: Lajnat ?iya:? ?at –
Tura:th ?a
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 مجلة الفتح للبحوث التربوية والنفسية
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
