Constructing a Scale of Intellectual Fraud according to the Generalized Partial Credit Model among University Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64940/jfath/2025.29.4.15Keywords:
intellectual fraud, generalized partial credit model (GPCM), University studentsAbstract
The current research aims to construct a scale for intellectual fraud among university students according to the generalized partial credit model. To achieve this, the researcher took scientific steps in the procedures for constructing the test, relying on Glance's definition to construct (25) items. Then, to verify the logical validity of the items and extract the apparent validity of measuring intellectual fraud, the scale was presented to (10) specialists in educational and psychological sciences, and in light of their comments, the wording of some of them was modified, and no item of the scale was excluded in order to obtain an agreement rate. Thus, the apparent validity of the scale was verified. After that, the scale was presented to a pilot sample of (40) male and female students who were randomly selected from the University of Baghdad to determine the time taken to perform the scale and the clarity of the instructions, to know the standard characteristics of the scale and to verify the assumptions of the generalized partial credit model. The scale was applied to a sample of (600) morning university students, who were randomly selected. The researcher relied on the Generalized Partial Credit Model (GPCM) in analyzing this, which is one of the models of modern theory of measurement and used the statistical program (SPSS jmetrik4.1). The most important results that she reached. The generalized partial credit model (GPCM) was found to be consistent with the model's assumptions, with all items having good properties. The researcher then reached a set of conclusions, recommendations, and suggestions.
References
المصادر والمراجع:-
1. الخولي، زياد (2013)اتجاهات معاصرة في القياس الموضوعي نموذج التقدير الجزئي متعدد التدريج).مجلة الآداب كلية الآداب، جامعة بغداد، 106، 653-680.
2. شلتز، داون (1983). نظريات الشخصية، ترجمة حمدلي الكربولي وعبد الرحمن القيسي، بغداد، مطابع التعليم العالي
3. علام، صلاح الدين محمود .( 2000): القياس والتقويم التربوي والنفسي اساسياته وتطبيقاته وتوجيهاته المعاصرة، ط1 القاهرة: دار الفكر العربي.
4. علام، صلاح الدين محمود (2006): الاختبارات والمقاييس التربوية والنفسية, عمان, ط1, دار الفكر للنشر والتوزيع.
5. علام، صلاح الدين محمود (2005): نماذج الاستجابة للمفردة الاختيارية أحادية البعد ومتعددة الأبعاد وتطبيقاتها في القياس النفسي والتربوي ،القاهرة : دار الفكر العربي.
6. علوان، بلال طارق حسين ( 2023): إعداد مقياس (باون - أون) للكفاءة التكيفية لدى طلبة الجامعة، مجلة نسق ، العدد 1، المجلد (37).
7. كاظم، أمينة محمد (1988):دراسة نظرية حول القياس الموضوعي للسلوك (نموذج راش) ، الكويت، مؤسسة الكويت للتقدم العلمي.
8. محمود، فريال محمود محمد الحاج( 2023): استخدام نموذج التقدير الجزئي المعمم في بناء مقياس لاتجاهات الطلاب نحو تغيير اجاباتهم على اسئلة، المجلة التربوية، العدد 146، المجلد 37.
ترجمة المصادر العربية والمراجع :-Arabic sources
1. Al-Kholi, Ziad (2013). Contemporary Trends in Objective Measurement: The Multi-Scale Partial Credit Model. Journal of Arts, College of Arts, University of Baghdad, 106, 653-680.
2. Schultz, Dawn (1983). Personality Theories, translated by Hamad Dali Al-Karbouli and Abdul Rahman Al-Qaisi, Baghdad, Higher Education Press.
3. Alam, Salah El-Din Mahmoud. (2000) Educational and Psychological Measurement and Evaluation: Its Basics, Applications, and Contemporary Directives, 1st ed., Cairo: Dar Al-Fikr Al-Arabi.
4. Allam, Salah Al-DeenMahmod (2006): Educational and Psychological Tests and Measurements, Amman, 1st ed., Dar Al-Fikr for Publishing and Distribution.
5. Allam, Salah Al-Deen Mahmood (2005): Unidimensional and Multidimensional Response Models for Optional Items and Their Applications in Psychological and Educational Measurement, Cairo: Dar Al-Fikr Al-Arabi.
6. Alwan, Bilal Tariq Hussein (2023): Preparing the (Bown-On) scale for adaptive competence among university students, Nasq Journal, Issue 1, Volume (37).
7. Kadhm, Amina Muhammed (1988): A theoretical study on the objective measurement of behavior (the Rasch model), Kuwait, Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Sciences.
8.Mahmoud, Ferial Mahmoud Muhammed Al-Hajj (2023): Using the generalized partial credit model to construct a scale for students' attitudes toward changing their answers to questions, Educational Journal, Issue 146, Volume 37.
المصادر والمراجع باللغة الانكليزية References :
1. Bortolotti, S., Tezza, R., de Andrade, D., Bornia, A. & de Sousa Junior, A. (2013). Relevance and advantages of using the item response theory. Qual Quant, 47, 2341-2360.
2. Clance, P. R. (1985). The Impostor Phenomenon: Overcoming the fear that haunts your success. Atlanta, GA: Peachtree.
3. Domino, G. & Domino, M. (2006). Psychological testing: An introduction (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press
4. Embretson, S. E. & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
5. Fraley, R., Waller, N. & Brennan, K. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of personality and social psychology, 78(2), 350-365.
6. Kolligian, J., Jr., & Sternberg, R. J. (1991). Perceived Fraudulence in young adults: Is there an "Imposter Syndrome"? Journal of Personality Assessment, 56(2), 308-326
7. Masters, G. N. (1982), A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. pcyhometric, Vol (47), (194-147).
8. Ostini, R., & Nering, M. L. (2006). Polytomous item response theory models. Sage University Paper Series QASS
9. Sonnak, C., & Towell, T. (2001). The impostor phenomenon in British university students: Relationships between self-esteem, mental health, parental rearing style, and socioeconomic status. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(6), 863-874.
10. Uto, M. & Ueno, M. (2018). Empirical comparison of item response theory models with rater's parameters. Heliyon, 4, 1-32.
11. Hellmen & Caselmen, (2004): The Impostor Phenomenon, and socioeconomic status. Personality and Individual Differences.
12. Van der Linden, W.J (2010): Item Response Theory, International Encyclopedia of Education, vol. 4, pp. 81-88.
13. Want, J., & Kleitman, S. (2006). Feeling "Phony": Adult achievement behavior, parental rearing style, and self-confidence. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 40(5), 961-971.
14. Robitzsch, A. & Steinfeld, J. (2018). Item response models for human ratings: overview, estimation methods, and implementation in Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 60(1), 101-139.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
حقوق النشر والترخيص
تطبق مجلة الفتح للبحوث التربوية والنفسية ترخيص CC BY (ترخيص Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International). يسمح هذا الترخيص للمؤلفين بالاحتفاظ بملكية حقوق الطبع والنشر لأوراقهم. لكن هذا الترخيص يسمح لأي مستخدم بتنزيل المقالة وطباعتها واستخراجها وإعادة استخدامها وأرشفتها وتوزيعها ، طالما تم منح الائتمان المناسب للمؤلفين ومصدر العمل. يضمن الترخيص أن المقالة ستكون متاحة على نطاق واسع بقدر الإمكان وأن المقالة يمكن تضمينها في أي أرشيف علمي.
لمزيد من المعلومات، يرجى متابعة الرابط: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
